This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/23278] SJLJ-exceptions broken
- From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Aug 2005 22:53:24 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/23278] SJLJ-exceptions broken
- References: <20050807195054.23278.jacob.navia@ants.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-09 22:53 -------
Subject: Re: SJLJ-exceptions broken
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, jacob dot navia at ants dot com wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From jacob dot navia at ants dot com 2005-08-09 19:57 -------
> If I can't mix SJLJ exceptions with DWARF2 exceptions how this is supposed to
> work?
How is what supposed to work?
> I mean I have to rebuild all libraries including libc, libm, and whatever????
Yes.
>
> This can't be.
It is.
> Besides, why this mixing should lead to the address of a
> function being stored in the high 32 bits of a 64 bit address?
Possibly because it's attempting to read the wrong place as if it
was an unwind table, and gets confused.
k
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23278