This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/15910] can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>)
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Aug 2005 08:35:28 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/15910] can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>)
- References: <20040610143911.15910.king.benjamin@mh-hannover.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-08-09 08:35 -------
Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector<T>, std::vector<T>)
"adah at netstd dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| ------- Additional Comments From adah at netstd dot com 2005-08-09 01:45 -------
| (In reply to comment #59)
| > Subject: Re: can't compile self defined void distance(std::vector<T>,
| std::vector<T>)
| > "adah at netstd dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| > | Does a compiler serve its users or the Standard committee?
| > Answer: Does a compiler that does not implement the standard specification
| > serves its users?
| > -- Gaby
|
| Answer to answer: Does a compiler that implement a wrong specification in the
| Standard serves the users?
The core issue is how do you determine that a standard specification
is wrong? Just because *you* don't like it? Sorry, that is insufficient.
There is a well-known body and a well-known process to handle that.
Please take it to the C++ standard committee.
| I am not requiring that GCC must fix the bug
Bugzilla is about bugs in GCC. If you think it is not a bug, then you
must take it to the place where they handle perceived bugs in the standard.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15910