This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Aug 2005 03:25:39 -0000
- Subject: [Bug debug/23190] [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for uninitialized variables (stabs)
- References: <20050802003405.23190.dpatel@apple.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-08-02 03:25 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for
uninitialized variables (stabs)
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-02 00:42 -------
> Actually the PR 21828 was orginally about stabs and not about dwarf-2:
> "When using gdb-309 and gdb-370 on MacOS X 10.3.9, even the simplest queries seem broken." so
> really PR 21828 should never been closed until the stabs problem was fixed.
Then the test case in the PR (which you provided) should not have used
DWARF-2. I rely on the bugmasters to reduce bugs -- and they do a great
job.
In any case, the problem is now either in the C front end or in the DBX
generator. Since the DWARF-2 generators do something reasonable,
AFAICT, I would guess the problem is in either the DBX generator, or the
GDB reader for STABS, or in the STABS format itself.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23190