This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/22635] OVERLOAD should not be a linked list of trees
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 24 Jul 2005 06:28:14 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/22635] OVERLOAD should not be a linked list of trees
- References: <20050723202503.22635.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-24 06:28 -------
If you look at both PR 8361 and 12850, they average both more than 40 Overloadeds. Those are both
real code so I don't know why people think this is stupid. Also linked lists especially with extra
locations still available is stupid. Look OVERLOAD only takes at max a pointer and boolean. The type is
shared.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22635