This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Jul 2005 19:47:15 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
- References: <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-20 19:47 -------
It may be true that this bug isn't going to be fixed in this cycle,
but there's no reason not to keep it open instead of suspending it.
The "suspend" state is mean for PRs where we need external things to
happen, such as a defect report to be accepted. This clearly isn't the
case here.
I'll close this PR and reopen 22575 instead.
W.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22575 ***
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131