This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
- From: "schlie at comcast dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Jul 2005 19:03:19 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/4131] Why the C++ compiler don't place a const class object to ".rodata" section?
- References: <20010826094601.4131.k_satoda@f2.dion.ne.jp>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-07-20 19:03 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > hmm, i think someone should reopen this bug.
> > 4.1 is a good place for major changes in c++ front-end ;)
> Not any more since we are in stage3 already.
- given that 4.1's front end has already evolved from that in 2.95,
it's not clear that a conclusion based on 2.95 is even valid for 4.1.
(so should no likely assumed as being so).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131