This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/22452] [4.1 regression] ICE expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'const_decl' in decl_linkage, at cp/tree.c:2132
- From: "gdr at integrable-solutions dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Jul 2005 20:53:33 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/22452] [4.1 regression] ICE expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'const_decl' in decl_linkage, at cp/tree.c:2132
- References: <20050713043209.22452.belyshev@depni.sinp.msu.ru>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-07-14 20:53 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE expected tree that contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'const_decl' in decl_linkage, at cp/tree.c:2132
"dberlin at dberlin dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
| ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-14 20:36 -------
| Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ICE expected tree that
| contains 'decl with visibility' structure, have 'const_decl' in
| decl_linkage, at cp/tree.c:2132
|
|
| > The point is that that is wrong, at least if the notion of linkage has
| > any relation with what C++ standard says.
|
| Please come up with a testcase that demonstrates it getting the wrong
| answer with the old result, or i'm simply going to do that.
come up with your patch and we will see, since you obviously prefer
to insult people when they are trying to help you.
-- Gaby
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22452