This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/22277] [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cc40001 in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566
- From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Jul 2005 01:59:41 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/22277] [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cc40001 in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566
- References: <20050702130552.22277.laurent@guerby.net>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-10 01:59 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE
cc40001 in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566
On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 12:54 +0000, dberlin at dberlin dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 12:54 -------
> Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE
> cc40001 in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566
>
> On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 09:33 +0000, pluto at agmk dot net wrote:
> > ------- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-08 09:33 -------
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > Most likely related to PR 22279.
> >
> > `first_vi_for_offset` bug still occurs and it's easy to reproduct
>
> There's a few bugs involved, it's just that the first_vi_for_offset is
> the common place for the assert to trigger.
Here is the reduced testcase for the C++ file you sent, i'm working on a
fix.
------- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-10 01:59 -------
Created an attachment (id=9236)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9236&action=view)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22277