This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/22319] New: tree check: expected integer_cst, have cond_expr tree-ssa-structalias.c:2410
- From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Jul 2005 01:52:42 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/22319] New: tree check: expected integer_cst, have cond_expr tree-ssa-structalias.c:2410
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
../../xgcc -B../../ -c -g -O2 -fPIC -DELF=1 -DLINUX=1 -W -Wall -gnatpg g-
socket.adb -o g-socket.o
+===========================GNAT BUG DETECTED==============================+
| 4.1.0 20050705 (experimental) (hppa-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error: |
| tree check: expected integer_cst, have cond_expr in |
| do_structure_copy, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2410 |
| Error detected at g-socket.adb:2246:1 |
| Please submit a bug report; see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html. |
| Use a subject line meaningful to you and us to track the bug. |
| Include the entire contents of this bug box in the report. |
| Include the exact gcc or gnatmake command that you entered. |
| Also include sources listed below in gnatchop format |
| (concatenated together with no headers between files). |
+==========================================================================+
Please include these source files with error report
Note that list may not be accurate in some cases,
so please double check that the problem can still
be reproduced with the set of files listed.
Doesn't fail at -O0.
--
Summary: tree check: expected integer_cst, have cond_expr tree-
ssa-structalias.c:2410
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22319