[Bug c/22249] New: GCC does not reject an incompatible type declaration

["neil at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

I don't believe the standard requires the following to be rejected, but as a QOI
issue I believe it should be.  The debatable point is whether you believe the
composite of the first two is specified by a function definition; if you do then
you must reject.  GCC rejects it if the order of the first two is switched.

void r(x) int (*x)[2]; {}
void r();
void r(int (*x)[3]);		/* Ideally rejected.  */

Flags are e.g. -Wall -std=c99 -pedantic

-- 
           Summary: GCC does not reject an incompatible type declaration
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: neil at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22249