This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/20256] Perfect nest transformation not conservative enough
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Jun 2005 23:20:26 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/20256] Perfect nest transformation not conservative enough
- References: <20050301012709.20256.fjahanian@apple.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-28 23:20 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> Andrew's code in comment #4 is invalid (don't call no-arg functions with
> arguments!), but here's a version that also passes through the c++
> frontend and crashes the optimizers:
Actually it is valid C. because "void f()" in C means the same as "void f(...)".
My testcase was to show the wrong code at the time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20256