This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/21799] [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members
- From: "bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 24 Jun 2005 16:03:15 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/21799] [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members
- References: <20050528163432.21799.bangerth@dealii.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at ices dot utexas dot edu 2005-06-24 16:03 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members
> Although I have not developed a patch, any patch will (more than likely) be
> non-trivial. I'll work on a fix, but don't think we should hold up 4.0.1
> for it. Does 4.0.0 compile spec2005?
I believe it does compile at least the one benchmark this affects.
> If it does, then I don't think we
> expect any performance difference between 4.0.0 and 4.0.1 anyway. If it
> doesn't, are all of those failures fixed in 4.0.1? If they are not, I
> don't think this one change matters in that regard.
This PR will is about the that 4.0.1 won't be able to compile this one
benchmark. However, given that SPEC 2005 isn't released yet, that's not such
a big deal if the problem gets fixed in 4.0.2. I personally would like to see
it fixed sooner rather than later, but I don't care too much if that is
before or after 4.0.1 is released -- for me, the annoyance is just that if my
nightly builds fail regularly, I don't catch other regressions that pop up
over time, and things are only discovered at a later time...
Cheers
Wolfgang
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21799