This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/22139] [4.0/4.1 regression] Segfault
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 21 Jun 2005 23:43:37 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/22139] [4.0/4.1 regression] Segfault
- References: <20050621175735.22139.bangerth@dealii.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-21 23:43 -------
This is the reason why ggc_free is considered a bad idea, because if this was really dead, it would have
been GC'd already but it is not dead. And isn't the reason why we moved alway from what 2.95.3 did to
the GC is so we don't have hard to debug problems like this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22139