This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/22005] [4.1 Regression] ICE: SSA_NAME verification failure
- From: "kreckel at ginac dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Jun 2005 22:16:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/22005] [4.1 Regression] ICE: SSA_NAME verification failure
- References: <20050610165320.22005.Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From kreckel at ginac dot de 2005-06-20 22:16 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ICE: SSA_NAME verification
failure
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Richard B. Kreckel wrote:
> On 20 Jun 2005, Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de wrote:
> > (BTW, even with its share of bugs, CLN might be a candidate for g++ regression
> > testing -- it has uncovered a handful of GCC (and some CLN) bugs over time.
> > Just a thought.)
>
> Bruno hat einmal erwaehnt, dass CLN tatsaechlich fuer Regressionstests
> hergehalten hat, damals, als der EGCS noch von Cygnus vorangetrieben
> worden ist. Mal gucken, ob jemand auf Deinen Vorschlag reagiert. Und
> danke vielmals fuer die Muehe!
Erhem....
I was saying that I'm under the impression that CLN used to be a part of
the regression tests. Sorry for the German.
The To:-line says "Ralf.Wildenhues@gmx.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
which happens when I try to reply privately. Silly Bugzilla.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22005