This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/22052] [4.0/4.1 Regression] redefinition of inline function succeeds
- From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 16 Jun 2005 12:41:34 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/22052] [4.0/4.1 Regression] redefinition of inline function succeeds
- References: <20050613190209.22052.echristo@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-06-16 12:41 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] redefinition of inline function
succeeds
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, echristo at redhat dot com wrote:
> OK. This diff works, and passes bootstrap with no regressions for both
> --enable-intermodule and normally on x86-linux. The --enable-intermodule bits
> are why we split this out in the first place, but same_translation_unit_p in the
> condition seems to handle that case.
>
> Joseph: What do you think?
I'm more interested in the testcases here than in the front-end changes
which make the testcases pass.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22052