This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
- From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 26 May 2005 18:17:22 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
- References: <20050526165558.21770.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-26 18:17 -------
... that said, if we agree about the substance of the issue, I volunteer to
work on it: have already some experience with rebind-related issues in
basic_string. Ah, yes, this extension makes certainly sense, because, for
basic_string doesn't exist an equivalent of 23.1/8, rebinding is necessary
in any case. Matter of consistency, in other terms: already noticed in
comment #23 of 19495, by the way ;)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21770