This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug fortran/20900] use-associated variable may not be equivalenced


------- Additional Comments From Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de  2005-05-19 19:22 -------
Subject: Re:  use-associated variable may not be equivalenced

jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk  2005-05-19 17:54 -------
> (In reply to comment #1)
> 
>>There's no 11.7 neither in the F95 nor the F2K drafts I'm having.  This is
>>invalid by the constraints in 5.5.1 in the F95 draft.  Is there any other
>>constraint you were aiming at?
> 
>  
> No, off-by-one, refering to 'note 11.8' in 11.3.2 which mentions the same
> constraint.

Thanks, I had only checked note 11.7 :-)



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20900


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]