This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/21630] [4.1 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1 fails
- From: "amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 May 2005 14:48:49 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21630] [4.1 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1 fails
- References: <20050517183923.21630.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 14:48 -------
A 20050513 dump shows:
...
/mnt/scratch/nightly/2005-05-13/srcw/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c:171:
note: not vectorized: complicated access pattern.
/mnt/scratch/nightly/2005-05-13/srcw/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c:72:
note: vectorized 1 loops in function.
foo (n)
...
20050517 shows:
...
/mnt/scratch/nightly/2005-05-17-orv/srcw/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c:171:
note: not vectorized: complicated access pattern.
/mnt/scratch/nightly/2005-05-17-orv/srcw/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c:72:
note: vectorized 2 loops in function.
foo (n)
...
So, the test fails because we don't vectorize the expected number (1)of loops -
we vectorize more. I suppose we should change the target patterns for the
scan-tree-dump-times tests.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dpatel at apple dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21630