This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/21638] [4.1 regression] dce is_gimple_reg_type (type=0x0) building newlib
- From: "hp at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 May 2005 16:01:44 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21638] [4.1 regression] dce is_gimple_reg_type (type=0x0) building newlib
- References: <20050517233510.21638.hp@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 16:01 -------
In reply to comment #3:
No, I don't think your reading of what rules you refer to is "sane",
but then perhaps you're not used to building a unified tree for cross
toolchains, re: simtest-howto.html. If you'd done that with any regularity,
then you'd have all the bits and would not see newlib as "free code bases to
download yourself". I stand by this; I think it can be expected that people
test with cross toolchains, for better test coverage than just their "native"
machines.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21638