This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/21587] Explicit inlining should never fail


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-05-15 17:33 -------
inline is always been just a hint to the compiler, sorry, this is how the standard is worded (or very 
close).

For 4.1.0, we should have optimization before inlining and should be better at estimating the size of 
the function.  The params are there so we can tune GCC, if you instead supply a testcase to a new bug 
where we don't inline fully, that would be better than changing how this works.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21587


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]