This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/21203] Segfault while compiling libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90
- From: "sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 May 2005 16:06:31 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/21203] Segfault while compiling libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90
- References: <20050425082043.21203.corsepiu@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu 2005-05-14 16:06 -------
Subject: Re: Segfault while compiling libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:14:48AM -0000, corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> Free free to hang on closely to standards ... to me, this sounds as being
> stubborn and non-helpful to the fortran community, nor to GCC nor to embedded
> systems. I'd prefer GCC to hang on to practical demands and implications
> stemming from practice instead of being religious about standards ignoring
> practical implications.
>
Dealing with vendor extensions are one of the top topic on
comp.lang.fortran. gfortran currently implements about 90-95%
of the standardize language. Those of us who actively work
on gfortran will probably use our time to implement Fortran
not some vendor extension that less than 0.01% of gfortran
users need.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21203