This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/21554] [4.0 Regression] ext/array_allocator/2.cc execution test fails on hppa64-hpux
- From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 May 2005 20:39:31 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/21554] [4.0 Regression] ext/array_allocator/2.cc execution test fails on hppa64-hpux
- References: <20050513192329.21554.jsm28@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-13 20:39 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ext/array_allocator/2.cc
execution test fails on hppa64-hpux
On Fri, 13 May 2005, pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
> Given our current basic_string implementation (which I'm maintaining) I can
> tell you that this testcase is very brittle: see 19495, that lead to the
> xfail for powerpc, for additional details. Benjamin's changes cannot have
> directly caused the fail and, IMHO, represent a very welcome clean-up.
So this should be treated as a known latent bug, a testcase which fails or
passes at random on targets requiring strict alignment? In which case
there should be an effective-target keyword for strict alignment and the
testcase should be xfailed on all such targets?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21554