This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/21010] New: New gcc.dg/vect tests fail
- From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 13 Apr 2005 22:01:08 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/21010] New: New gcc.dg/vect tests fail
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
The failures
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-2.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-3.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-4.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-5.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-6.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-7.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-9.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 0 loops 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
(all new tests) appeared on mainline between 20050411 and 20050412, on
i686-pc-linux-gnu and ia64-hp-hpux11.23. Perhaps these tests, added by
2004-04-11 Devang Patel <dpatel@apple.com>
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_vect_condition): New.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-1.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-2.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-3.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-4.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-5.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-6.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-ifcvt-7.c: New test.
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-none.c: Now one loop is vectorized.
are insufficiently portable.
--
Summary: New gcc.dg/vect tests fail
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: dpatel at apple dot com,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21010