This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug fortran/13082] Function entries and entries with alternate returns not implemented
- From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Apr 2005 01:21:11 -0000
- Subject: [Bug fortran/13082] Function entries and entries with alternate returns not implemented
- References: <20031117013315.13082.kargl@12-230-81-20.client.attbi.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-08 01:21 -------
(In reply to comment #25)
>
> I do not understand your tone. There is a compiler, g77, which works and
> implements at least the Fortran 77 standard. I don't see any reason why it
> should be replaced in the distribution by a compiler which is not yet mature
> enough to implement the same standard.
Are you aware of the fact that g77 *is completely* broken with
respect to the gcc-4.x branch? There is no one who is going to
fix the problem because the effort to fix g77 is estimated to
be equilavent to implementing an actually F95 compiler.
> The attitude expressed in "piss off the people who owe you nothing"
> can be very bad for the future of Linux.
I don't use linux. Never have, never will. I use FreeBSD on an
AMD64 platform where there are no commercially available F95 compilers.
I have zero compiler writing experience, yet you'll find that I've
contributed 69 patches to make gfortran work. Those patches came
about because I need a compiler, and I decided to contribute something
to GCC other than whining and making disparaging remarks. I don't
know about my fellow contributors, but I find that I have little
motivation to continue to work on gfortran occur when indivudals
come here to tell us that gfortran is useless.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13082