This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/20540] "-march=i386" doesn't mean "limit instruction set to what 80386 understands"
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Mar 2005 21:42:45 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/20540] "-march=i386" doesn't mean "limit instruction set to what 80386 understands"
- References: <20050318202510.20540.zeev.tarantov@gmail.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-18 21:42 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Why do you think movzbl is not an instruction on i386?
Just one more nore, movzbl is the same as movzx. This is where AT&T vs Intel asm format is different.
So this is not a bug.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20540