This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/20280] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:368
- From: "jason at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Mar 2005 06:47:25 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/20280] [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:368
- References: <20050302093824.20280.caolanm@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2005-03-08 06:47 -------
Subject: Re: [PR c++/20280] hoist indirect_ref out of addressable cond_exprs
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 23:26:04 -0800, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Your reading is logical, but it depends on exactly what "lvalue for a
> bit-field" means. (Note that it does not say "lvalue *is* a bit-field"; it
> says "lvalue *for* a bit-field".)
In fact, there's a core issue for exactly that question; Steve's proposed
wording clarifies that these expressions are lvalues for a bit-field.
Jason
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20280