This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/17278] [4.0/4.1 Regression] 8% C++ compile-time regression in comparison with 3.4.1 at -O1 optimization level
- From: "kgardas at objectsecurity dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 2 Mar 2005 21:25:20 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/17278] [4.0/4.1 Regression] 8% C++ compile-time regression in comparison with 3.4.1 at -O1 optimization level
- References: <20040902085559.17278.kgardas@objectsecurity.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From kgardas at objectsecurity dot com 2005-03-02 21:25 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] 8% C++ compile-time
regression in comparison with 3.4.1 at -O1 optimization level
I agree with Giovanni that both #17278 and #13776 are fixed from MICO
compile-time regressions point of view. If you would like to close them,
I'm also for it, just please be careful with #13776 which seems to
"accumulate" more staff than only MICO-related regressions.
Thanks!
Karel
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17278