This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/20238] signed/unsigned multiplication + sign extension broken 32->64 bit sign promotion?
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 27 Feb 2005 21:10:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/20238] signed/unsigned multiplication + sign extension broken 32->64 bit sign promotion?
- References: <20050227210344.20238.ch@dot-heine.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-27 21:10 -------
This is invalid.
(unsigned int)(signed_char) is still signed extened.
if you don't want a sign extension do:
(unsigned int)(unsigned char)(signed_char).
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20238