This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/8361] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
- From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 6 Feb 2005 16:54:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/8361] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] C++ compile-time performance regression
- References: <20021025133601.8361.gerald@pfeifer.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-06 16:54 -------
Considering the numbers from #44, #48, and #49, I think we can conclude
that we are back to the compile times GCC 3.0 used to have. It should
be noted that we have a significantly larger memory foot print though,
and some of the speedups (especially from GCC 3.2 to GCC 3.3) came from
smaller hacks to the GC system (collect less often, etc.). But then,
most people just use the compiler with -O[0123] and no fancy --params
and similar hacks, so from a user POV this bug really is fixed, mostly.
I'm not sure if it is useful to keep this bug open any longer.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8361