This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug tree-optimization/19639] Funny (horrible) code for empty destructor
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 29 Jan 2005 20:48:12 -0000
- Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/19639] Funny (horrible) code for empty destructor
- References: <20050126134950.19639.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 20:48 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> What other pass than fold() is supposed to handle this sort of simplification?
Actually if you look at the tree dumps you will see that we removed that if. It does not help the testcase
as we already removed that if on the rtl level. But now the only problem is removing empty loops.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19639