This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/19249] abstract classes should not access virtually inherited class constructor
- From: "gianni at mariani dot ws" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Jan 2005 06:47:51 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/19249] abstract classes should not access virtually inherited class constructor
- References: <20050104053610.19249.gianni@mariani.ws>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From gianni at mariani dot ws 2005-01-14 06:47 -------
> Quoting the standard again (the same passage which we all quoted):
James Kanze added a comment in this bug - I'll quote it here:
> The context of the quote from the standard is:
> "If the constructor of the most derived class does not
> specify a mem-initializer for the virtual base class
> V ...". In the code submitted, the constructor of the
> most derived class DOES specify a mem-initializer, so
> none of what follows applies.
Comments ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19249