This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/19399] [4.0 Regression] mutexes support broken
- From: "joel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Jan 2005 17:15:41 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/19399] [4.0 Regression] mutexes support broken
- References: <20050112144007.19399.corsepiu@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-12 17:15 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think the most flexible and simple solution would be to add a
> rtems_gxx_recursive_mutex_init to RTEMS.
>
> Also, I'd prefer to use this definition
> typedef void * __gthread_recursive_mutex_t;
Grrr.. looking back through the old mail and mail lists, that was indeed the
intent when this was first mentioned. I just added a new GCC patch and the
corresponding RTEMS patch (for reference). What do you think of them?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19399