This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug bootstrap/19072] [4.0 Regression] --disable-static bootstrap failure
- From: "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Dec 2004 04:27:16 -0000
- Subject: [Bug bootstrap/19072] [4.0 Regression] --disable-static bootstrap failure
- References: <20041218213303.19072.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-12-19 04:27 -------
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] --disable-static bootstrap
> ------- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2004-12-19 03:35
> -------
> I don't believe libiberty had ever properly supported --disable-static at
> all.
> Basically libiberty just ignored it. A static arhive, which wasn't compiled
> with PIC, was built. With my patch, libiberty tries not to build the static
> archive, which, of course, isn't supported by libiberty. I will submit a
> patch
> to ignore --disable-static. But I have no idea how --disable-static in
> libiberty could have worked on all platforms for binutils.
The AIX failure was due to the fact there were no .o files in the
locations specified in the ar command (there were only .lo files).
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19072