This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug rtl-optimization/16613] [3.4 Regression] compile time regression, when adding cerr usage
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 11 Dec 2004 08:10:40 -0000
- Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/16613] [3.4 Regression] compile time regression, when adding cerr usage
- References: <20040718101108.16613.andre.maute@gmx.de>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-11 08:10 -------
Here is my timings for 3.3.2 vs the mainline on powerpc-darwin (yesterdays before a patch which
should speed it up a little more):
[zhivago:~/src/localgccPRs] pinskia% time ~/gcc-3.3//bin/gcc pr16613.ii -S -D__DEBUG__ -O2
5.600u 0.340s 0:06.99 84.9% 0+0k 0+3io 0pf+0w
[zhivago:~/src/localgccPRs] pinskia% time ~/local3/bin/gcc pr16613.ii -S -D__DEBUG__ -O2
6.190u 0.590s 0:07.69 88.1% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
Plus this is a mainline preprocessed source so it looks like the mainline is slightly slower than 3.3.2
(about 10%).
For -O0:
[zhivago:~/src/localgccPRs] pinskia% time ~/gcc-3.3//bin/gcc pr16613.ii -S -D__DEBUG__
2.980u 0.260s 0:04.70 68.9% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
[zhivago:~/src/localgccPRs] pinskia% time ~/local3/bin/gcc pr16613.ii -S -D__DEBUG__
1.600u 0.270s 0:02.29 81.6% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
So we are much faster for -O0.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16613