This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c/18887] libgcc2.h Improperly determines required built-in function size requirements.
- From: "schlie at comcast dot net" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 8 Dec 2004 15:24:14 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c/18887] libgcc2.h Improperly determines required built-in function size requirements.
- References: <20041208130405.18887.schlie@comcast.net>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2004-12-08 15:24 -------
Subject: Re: libgcc2.h Improperly determines required
built-in function size requirements.
> From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-08
> 14:36 -------
> Is this really a bug as almost all 8/16bit targets provide their own libgcc1?
Wouldn't call it critical, but given libgcc2's present selection logic
arguably needlessly prevents it's practical use on smaller platforms, I'm
sure it's contributed to the decision. (but regardless, would think it
would be preferable to remove future impediments to it's use).
[I'd be pleased to submit a patch, but would realistically require
assistance verifying that the refinements don't create any regressions
on existing platforms, would that be potentially acceptable?]
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18887