This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/18542] [3.4 only] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
- From: "joel at oarcorp dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 18 Nov 2004 14:26:50 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/18542] [3.4 only] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression as operand
- References: <20041118122413.18542.corsepiu@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-18 14:26 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4 only] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression
as operand
corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-18 13:14 -------
> The same ICE occurs for avr-rtems* and h8300-rtems* toolchains having been built
> from the same sources.
>
>
A bit more follow up. Again the 4.6 tools are gcc 3.2.3 based
and the 4.7 are gcc 3.3.5.
+ /opt/rtems-4.6/bin/arm-rtems-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.6/bin/h8300-rtems-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.6/bin/i386-rtems-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.6/bin/i960-rtems-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.6/bin/m68k-rtems-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.6/bin/mips-rtems-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.6/bin/powerpc-rtems-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.6/bin/sh-rtemself-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.6/bin/sh-rtems-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.6/bin/sparc-rtems-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.7/bin/arm-rtems4.7-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.7/bin/i386-rtems4.7-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.7/bin/m68k-rtems4.7-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.7/bin/mips64-rtems4.7-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.7/bin/mips-rtems4.7-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.7/bin/powerpc-rtems4.7-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.7/bin/sh-rtemself4.7-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
+ /opt/rtems-4.7/bin/sparc-rtems4.7-gcc -O1 -c cpuboot.c
I tried it again at -O4 and it all compiled fine.
I think it is pretty safe to assume at this point that the
problem is specific to 3.4.
--joel
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18542