This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/14563] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions
- From: "ken dot duda at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 14 Nov 2004 22:40:52 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/14563] new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions
- References: <20040312233606.14563.paulthomas2@wanadoo.fr>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From ken dot duda at gmail dot com 2004-11-14 22:40 -------
Subject: Re: new/delete much slower than malloc/free because of sjlj exceptions
> Did you miss the question?
Umm, apparently I did.. the only thing I see in the bug log that looks
like a question is this:
> Does this imply that I have picked up Dwarf2 as a default?
I don't know the answer. The only thing I can say that might be
related is that there are assembly statements in my output like "call
__Unwind_SjLj_Register"; that (with the --enable-sjlj-exceptions) has
led me to believe I'm using SjLj exceptions.
Again, let me know if there's anything I can help with.
-Ken
On 14 Nov 2004 18:04:07 -0000, paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> ------- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2004-11-14 18:04 -------
> Subject: Re: new/delete much slower than malloc/free because
> of sjlj exceptions
>
>
> Ken,
>
> Did you miss the question?
>
> Paul
>
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14563