This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/18448] g++ attempts to use copy constructor instead of operator = on instantiated object
- From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Nov 2004 13:41:11 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/18448] g++ attempts to use copy constructor instead of operator = on instantiated object
- References: <20041112104242.18448.megath@iof.ru>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-12 13:41 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> about
> <i>Copy constructor access check while initializing a reference.</i>
> ? yes. sorry.
> *p = A() constructs copy of object now? what for ?
No we don't contruct a copy of the object, did you really read it. I just says it has to be accessable, it
will not be used.
> doesnt it degrades perfomance?
Only slightly compile time and that is it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18448