This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/17611] ifstream could not read multiple files
- From: "kemin dot zhou at ferring dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 23 Sep 2004 02:08:14 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/17611] ifstream could not read multiple files
- References: <20040922153153.17611.kemin.zhou@ferring.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From kemin dot zhou at ferring dot com 2004-09-23 02:08 -------
Subject: Re: ifstream could not read multiple files
pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
>------- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2004-09-22 15:55 -------
>Not a bug, very well known, by the way, see:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/faq/index.html#4_4_iostreamclear
>
>The standard in force, as also clarifed by the resolution of DR22, does **not**
>say that open clears the flags!
>
>
>
Thanks a lot. Well, some other compilers has the ability to ability to
open multiple files. Maybe we should change
the standard. I am not sure what is the benefit for leaving in the bad
state even after a close and re.open operation.
But this is a minor thing I can live with.
Kemin
**********************************************************************
Proprietary or confidential information belonging to Ferring Holding SA or to one of its affiliated companies may be contained in the message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for the delivery of the message to such person), please do not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, please destroy this message and notify the sender by reply e-mail. Please advise the sender immediately if you or your employer do not consent to e-mail for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message represent the opinion of the sender and do not necessarily represent or reflect the views and opinions of Ferring.
**********************************************************************
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17611