This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/16460] [3.5 Regression] ICE when compiling glibc (ld-ctype.c)
- From: "jh at suse dot cz" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Sep 2004 23:59:08 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/16460] [3.5 Regression] ICE when compiling glibc (ld-ctype.c)
- References: <20040709202544.16460.drepper@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz 2004-09-10 23:59 -------
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] ICE when compiling glibc (ld-ctype.c)
>
> ------- Additional Comments From rth at redhat dot com 2004-09-10 19:07 -------
> Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] ICE when compiling glibc (ld-ctype.c)
>
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:34:10PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > Richard, does this seem sane? I probably should do that in
> > unnest_function_tree so it is done at the time unnesting really happens
> > instead of waiting for the end of compilation. I will do this change
> > before putting in the patch if this approach looks sane to you.
>
> I think I would prefer that. Provide a function in cgraph*.c to
> perform the cgraph_node manipulation, and call that from the end
> of tree-nested.c.
Yeah, sure, I didn't intend to commit the patch in the current form, I
just got short of time and I was unsure if you don't have different
approach in mind.
I will create updated version, thanks.
Honza
>
>
> r~
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16460
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16460