This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/17401] [4.0 Regression] ICE with checking after parse error (?)
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Sep 2004 18:46:17 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/17401] [4.0 Regression] ICE with checking after parse error (?)
- References: <20040910155309.17401.steven@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-09-10 18:46 -------
:-) I think I saw Mark submit a patch maybe a year ago that really
required the token "0" to indicate that a function is abstract. I
have a hard time understanding why anyone would use anything different
anyway, but that may be beyond the point...
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17401