This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/16030] [3.4/3.5 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
- From: "mark at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 12 Aug 2004 14:35:30 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/16030] [3.4/3.5 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
- References: <20040617025326.16030.dannysmith@users.sourceforge.net>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2004-08-12 14:35 -------
Subject: Re: [3.4/3.5 Regression] [cygwin/mingw]: stdcall
function decoration vs LTHUNK alias in multiple inheritanc
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-12 08:15 -------
>Mark, can you review the patch at
>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-07/msg00534.html?
>
>
As a minor point, the get_identifier bit of that patch is very
inefficient. Instead, assemble_alias should be modified to take a "char
*" argument, or a new function should be created that both
assemble_alias and make_alias_fr_thunk can use.
But, a more major point is that I'm not at all confident that it's
correct to use the encoded name on all targets. Maybe
ASM_OUTPUT_DEF_FROM_DECLS should be defined for these targets instead?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16030