This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/16948] [3.5 Regression] Many new testsuite failures on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
- From: "jason at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 10 Aug 2004 18:34:39 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/16948] [3.5 Regression] Many new testsuite failures on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
- References: <20040809181318.16948.danglin@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From jason at redhat dot com 2004-08-10 18:34 -------
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] Many new testsuite
failures on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
On 10 Aug 2004 18:14:19 -0000, "dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> Well mostly. The regressions on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 are fixed but in
> testing I found what appears to be another regression on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11:
>
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c execution, -O0
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c execution, -O1
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c execution, -O2
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c execution, -O3 -g
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-1.c execution, -Os
>
> I think it is likely that this failure is caused by either the fix
> or the previous change.
I would find that surprising, since DECL_BY_REFERENCE is only used by the
C++ front end.
Jason
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16948