This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/6424] [DR 339] sizeof() with overload resolution
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 9 Aug 2004 17:41:15 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/6424] [DR 339] sizeof() with overload resolution
- References: <20020423071601.6424.jens.maurer@gmx.net>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-08-09 17:41 -------
Thanks, Gaby. I had seen this example in the standard, but didn't really
understand why it is important to keep the two functions apart since
I didn't think of the case I=J=0. That clarifies the matter for me :-)
Thanks
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6424