This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug target/16640] In function `__floattidf':, libgcc2.c:1292: internal compiler error: in expand_shift, at expmed.c:2111
- From: "john dot spelis at 3dlabs dot com" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Jul 2004 17:22:39 -0000
- Subject: [Bug target/16640] In function `__floattidf':, libgcc2.c:1292: internal compiler error: in expand_shift, at expmed.c:2111
- References: <20040720100818.16640.john.spelis@3dlabs.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From john dot spelis at 3dlabs dot com 2004-07-20 17:22 -------
Andrew, I apologise, i'm new to Bugzilla and did not read your comment
until posting my own. You guy's are hero's and Geniuses.
Keep up the magnificent work.
Best Regards.
(In reply to comment #3)
> Actually that means it is fixed and a bug in 3.0.x which is known and I
thought was documented.
> And it is:
> From <http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html>:
> GCC 3.3 and GCC 3.4 trigger code generation bugs in earlier versions of the
GNU compiler (especially
> GCC 3.0.x versions), which lead to the miscompilation of the stage1 compiler
and the subsequent
> failure of the bootstrap process. A workaround is to use GCC 3.2.3 as an
intermediary stage, i.e. to
> bootstrap that compiler with the base compiler and then use it to bootstrap
the final compiler.
(In reply to comment #3)
> Actually that means it is fixed and a bug in 3.0.x which is known and I
thought was documented.
> And it is:
> From <http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html>:
> GCC 3.3 and GCC 3.4 trigger code generation bugs in earlier versions of the
GNU compiler (especially
> GCC 3.0.x versions), which lead to the miscompilation of the stage1 compiler
and the subsequent
> failure of the bootstrap process. A workaround is to use GCC 3.2.3 as an
intermediary stage, i.e. to
> bootstrap that compiler with the base compiler and then use it to bootstrap
the final compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16640