This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/16237] [3.5 Regression] ICE caused by Kenner's big untested (regression causing) patch
- From: "kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 20 Jul 2004 00:53:58 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/16237] [3.5 Regression] ICE caused by Kenner's big untested (regression causing) patch
- References: <20040627212339.16237.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu 2004-07-20 00:53 -------
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] ICE caused by Kenner's big untested (regression causing) patch
Note the reasons why all of these are the same bugs come from the fact
if you change the memory layout slightly, it can make the ICE to show
up. I have not come up with a testcase as any slight change even
-save-temps will not show the ICE.
Does the fold-const.c change I posted last week address this? I've heard
both "yes" and "no" and am confused.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16237