This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 19 Jul 2004 13:59:21 -0000
- Subject: [Bug libstdc++/16612] empty basic_strings can't live in shared memory
- References: <20040718033747.16612.steve.horn@gs.com>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-07-19 13:59 -------
The claim is valid. Let's let the libstdc++ maintainers comment, as I'm
sure there are standards and/or ABI implications in storing a single empty
string representation.
Andrew, please try to be less dismissive for bug reports where you don't
understand what's going on. C++'s allocator scheme is created _exactly_ for
the case the submitter wants to use it for.
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16612