This is the mail archive of the gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug c++/16295] -pedantic option resolves compiler error "sorry, unimplemented: ..."


------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org  2004-07-01 14:22 -------
> Still, the question remains, why the -pedantic flag results in NOT 
> crashing?? 
 
I have no clue, but since this case was fixed already, it's hard to tell. 
One could go about and try to find a _small_ testcase for 3.3.x in 
which it ICEs unless we give -pedantic. Then we could figure out what 
is happening there and and see if the same patch could also be 
applied to mainline. However, since development generally only happens 
on mainline, I doubt that anyway has the energy to do things like this. 
Let's just wait until we get a similar bug against mainline, and then 
reconsider whether we need to do the necessary investigations. 
 
W. 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16295


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]