This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug middle-end/16237] [3.5 Regression] ICE caused by Kenner's big untested (regression causing) patch
- From: "pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 28 Jun 2004 01:38:56 -0000
- Subject: [Bug middle-end/16237] [3.5 Regression] ICE caused by Kenner's big untested (regression causing) patch
- References: <20040627212339.16237.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu 2004-06-28 01:38 -------
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] ICE caused by Kenner's big untested (regression causing) patch
>
> But does this not cause a performance regression.
>
> It adds a couple of lines of code, but nothing likely measurable: there
> is a hash table in use here, after all.
>
> Nevertheless, I'd rather handle the zero case in the ARRAY_REF and
> COMPONENT_REF case instead of all cases.
I was talking about code generation rather than compile time.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16237