This is the mail archive of the
gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Bug c++/16190] spurious warning about non-virtual destructor
- From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" <gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 25 Jun 2004 13:52:42 -0000
- Subject: [Bug c++/16190] spurious warning about non-virtual destructor
- References: <20040625022626.16190.ncm-nospam@cantrip.org>
- Reply-to: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-06-25 13:52 -------
I would claim that in most cases the compiler warning is actually
justified.
The question what we put into -Wall is always a judgment call, so reasonable
people may disagree whether a particular warning should be in it or not.
However, it should be undisputed that moving individual warnings from one
general class to another one is bad, since it forces people to rewrite
their makefiles if they want this warning. Given that one can switch this
warning off separately, I will close this PR.
W.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16190